top of page
Search
Writer's pictureGus Keller

Fall



Fall offsets questionable substance with decent pacing. Its opening is a rushed trope, forming flat characters and weak motivations. Also, the dialogue is blunt and contrived. However, once the main plot begins, Fall finds a rhythm of suspense, reveals, and relatability. Often, B-thrillers overemphasize obstacles and melodrama, forgetting to decelerate for character moments. Instead, Fall lets its tension breathe, giving viewers specifics to care about. There are solid twists, character developments, and varied survival tactics. Plus, the acting gets vulnerable despite the rocky start. Therefore, even though Fall is unrealistic and shallow, audiences should buy into the excitement.


Technically, Fall is surprisingly effective. Its unknown cast, generic music, and inconsistent effects are forgivable. The desert wasteland and decaying tower heighten dread. The editing eventually slows down, providing smash cuts, intercuts, and dissolves. The imagery uses lighting, angles, composition, mounts, framing, and focus. This adds emphasis and diversifies the limited setting. Finally, the sound creates immersive suspense. Anxiety is symbolized through whistles and muffling, echoes add importance, and tension builds with structural creaks and howling winds. Thus, Fall ultimately elevates its simple premise and tacky start. It's not enlightenment but fairly entertaining.


Writing: 4/10

Direction: 6/10

Cinematography: 7/10

Acting: 7/10

Editing: 6/10

Sound: 8/10

Score/Soundtrack: 5/10

Production Design: 6/10

Casting: 3/10

Effects: 6/10

Overall Score: 5.8/10

6 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Carry-On

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page