top of page
Search

Buddy

  • Writer: Gus Keller
    Gus Keller
  • 54 minutes ago
  • 1 min read

Buddy's high concept invites themes of childhood screen addiction. The first act's slow unveiling is magnetic. From there, it focuses on drama. However, the third act loses depth as its plot impedes character development. Instead of a protagonist arc or continued pop culture deconstructions, the script tends towards absurdist shock value. This reinforces a horror-comedy tone, yet feels like a slightly missed opportunity after such a psychological beginning. It has setup/payoff, concise exposition, and detailed spoofs. Blending cheesy alongside raw intensity, the performances expertly code-switch. Therefore, Buddy is a better premise than a story, but both are worthwhile.


Buddy commits to a stylistic framing device. Its direction juxtaposes genres plus moods. The cinematography plays with television conventions like aspect ratios, lighting, and flat composition. Despite losing steam, its editing's three-act structure elevates tension. Exaggerated horror and cartoonish stings enhance the soundscape. Its music homages kids' songs while remaining plot-relevant. Immersive and even surreal, the production design embraces a 90s TV aesthetic. Though minorly famous, its cast has fitting skill. Intentionally silly, the effects employ retro, practical techniques. Overall, Buddy is a mischievous filmmaking exercise that fulfills much of its potential.


Writing: 6/10

Direction: 8/10

Cinematography: 8/10

Acting: 8/10

Editing: 7/10

Sound: 8/10

Score/Soundtrack: 9/10

Production Design: 10/10

Casting: 6/10

Effects: 9/10


Overall Score: 7.9/10


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Movie Film Reviews. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page