Digger
Arguably overwrought, Digger's flawed ambition is forgivable. Being meta isn't absolution, but it fits with themes of mythologization and narrative control. While environmental satire is important, the focus on warping nonfiction into stories is more thought-provoking. It has a thin plot plus distant drama (with brief vulnerability from the villain-protagonist). Paired with a cartoonish tenor, viewer alienation comes easily. Still, cold scripts can have merit. There's brisk dialogue, a high concept, framing devices, motifs, and humor. The stylized acting can feel excessive, but contains exaggeration, timing, intensity, layers, and sincerity. Thus, Digger's pros outweigh its cons.
Digger is artistic. Though unwieldy, its direction creates distinct senses of realism, style, and tone. Despite drab tendencies, the imagery consistently builds unique, meaningful compositions. Its editing becomes a bit monotonous, but pacing is tight while structure is clear. Blending nature, acoustics, and electronics, the quirky music reinforces the mood as well as its messages. Classism, symbols, and artifice are exaggerated via its surreal production design. The famous cast has prestige plus against-type fit. Its effects use an array of techniques to construct a playfully manufactured reality. Digger may not connect with wide audiences, but its filmmaking is undeniable.
Writing: 7/10
Direction: 9/10
Cinematography: 9/10
Acting: 8/10
Editing: 7/10
Sound: 8/10
Score/Soundtrack: 10/10
Production Design: 10/10
Casting: 10/10
Effects: 9/10
Overall Score: 8.7/10
Comments