top of page
Search
Writer's pictureGus Keller

Heart of Stone



Impressively derivative, Heart of Stone begs to be forgotten background noise. It's all generic plot with no personal emotions, forcing viewers to disengage. It's painfully boring, predictable, and meaningless because it's terrified of originality and vulnerability. There are no themes, the protagonist doesn't arc, and motivations are superficial. It has empty characters, groaner comedy, constant exposition dumps, formulaic cliches, bland MacGuffins, Deus ex machina, forced dialogue, coincidences, and excessive climactic plotlines. The acting is gratingly wooden, one-note, and unrelatable. Ultimately, Heart of Stone feels like an A.I.-generated script because it's a robotic cash-grab.


Technically, Heart of Stone is passionless. Its direction has a sanitized tone, zero tension, and indifferent action. The effects use uncanny CGI. Its editing rushes pacing, overcuts combat, disregards momentum, and bloats the runtime. The production design is hollow and routine, creating an aesthetic void. Its imagery is similarly plain, with throwaway shots and unmotivated handhelds. The music adds arbitrary songs and generic scoring. Its adequate sound offers action, emphasis, split cuts, muffling, and smash inserts. The cast is led by Gadot but films like these weaken her reputation. Overall, Heart of Stone is more of a corporate product than a form of art or entertainment.


Writing: 2/10

Direction: 2/10

Cinematography: 4/10

Acting: 3/10

Editing: 3/10

Sound: 6/10

Score/Soundtrack: 4/10

Production Design: 4/10

Casting: 6/10

Effects: 4/10


Overall Score: 3.8/10

4 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page