top of page
Search
Writer's pictureGus Keller

Bird Box



Bird Box is mixed. It has a catchy premise, a flawed protagonist, earned romance, inclusivity, and personal struggles. There are themes of emotional walls, freedom, and sacrifice. The acting offers sporadic intensity, layers, vulnerability, tension, chemistry, and release. Still, these ingredients are haphazardly constructed with cluttered characters, disconnected setup/payoff, and pointless threads. The supernatural threats are unclear and convoluted. It sidesteps the climax, forces resolution, and muddles its themes. These key issues magnify the obvious exposition, corny dialogue, illogical choices, and derivative cliches. Overall, Bird Box's unfocused nature stifles its potential.


Technically, Bird Box's design flaws defuse suspense and tone. The editing adds dual timelines, dissolves, inserts, cross cuts, pacing, and match cuts, but its structure is misguided. Its imagery has POVs, motion, framing, depth, and angles, yet its composition is mild. Its music creates tension with fairly generic stinging and feedback. The production design utilizes a sense of location but often feels superficial. The effects provide passable violence, stunts, and CGI. Its cast is surprisingly deep. The sound uses voiceovers, split cuts, ringing, muting, layers, distortions, emphasis, risers, and action. Ultimately, Bird Box is mostly proficient, but its errors are central.


Writing: 5/10

Direction: 4/10

Cinematography: 6/10

Acting: 8/10

Editing: 5/10

Sound: 8/10

Score/Soundtrack: 6/10

Production Design: 6/10

Casting: 8/10

Effects: 7/10


Overall Score: 6.3/10

3 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page