top of page
Search
Writer's pictureGus Keller

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets



Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets moderately improves on its predecessor. The acting of the children is the clearest step forward. Radcliffe, Watson and Grint are much more natural this time around. Next, the special effects are better. There are superior practical effects (most notably, the serpent head) and no uncanny valley moments. Lastly, the writing flows more smoothly than in the previous film. Because there is less to introduce, Chamber of Secrets is evenly paced and emotional beats have more time to marinate. Furthermore, themes of racism are introduced. They might lack subtlety, but it's nice to have some subtext to digest.


Chamber of Secrets makes technical advancements as well. The music is more integrated and a stronger dramatic guide. Meanwhile, the production design is elaborated with the titular Chamber feeling very large and lived in. This adds depth to the wizarding world that was somewhat absent in Sorcerer's Stone. However, despite these enhancements, Chamber of Secrets still feels a tad bogged down by its bloated runtime and its antiquated direction. Ultimately, Chamber of Secrets is a solid film but could use more filmmaking artistry to be truly exceptional.


Writing: 7/10

Direction: 6/10

Cinematography: 7/10

Acting: 7/10

Editing: 6/10

Sound: 7/10

Score/Soundtrack: 10/10

Production Design: 9/10

Casting: 8/10

Effects: 8/10


Overall Score: 7.5/10

17 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page