top of page
Search
Writer's pictureGus Keller

Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom



Temple of Doom is flawed but effective. It has contrivances, incidental motivations, annoying sidekicks, regressive stereotypes, and forgettable MacGuffins. There's cringey romance/comedy, minimal detective work, and the protagonist's arc is fairly generic. The story sometimes feels like an assortment of leftovers from the original. Still, it strikes a steady flow of concise excitement and its bleaker content helps it differentiate itself. Meanwhile, the acting is shallow but positive, with Ford being the same icon, Capshaw doing her best, and Quan injecting some charm. Ultimately, Temple of Doom has cliches and broad emotions, but it remains an excellent adventure homage.


Technically, Temple of Doom has showmanship. The imagery uses lighting, motion, framing, color, composition, and angles. Its editing offers pacing, inserts, montages, dissolves, match cuts, intercuts, and cross cuts. The sound adds vivid combat, stings, setting, and echoes, but gets silly at times. Its music blends the region and darker mood, yet keeps its iconic themes. The production design establishes exotic locations, classic costumes, and grand set pieces. Its cast is carried by Ford and Quan. The elaborate effects have stunts, composites, dummies, fire, water, green screens, prosthetics, miniatures, and Matte paintings. Overall, Temple of Doom achieves rare levels of entertainment.


Writing: 6/10

Direction: 9/10

Cinematography: 9/10

Acting: 7/10

Editing: 9/10

Sound: 9/10

Score/Soundtrack: 10/10

Production Design: 9/10

Casting: 9/10

Effects: 10/10


Overall Score: 8.7/10

3 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page