top of page
Search

Mad Max (1979)

Writer's picture: Gus KellerGus Keller


Mad Max is a trailblazer. While thin and disjointed, its story demonstrates potential. The "family man driven to a revenge rampage" is a trope, but its morally questionable downfall arc is complex. Though simplistic, its plot suggests social commentary through anarchistic world-building and extreme characters. This gives way to themes about corruption, humanity, and environmentalism. The actual execution is, unfortunately, vague and meandering, yet the seeds of excellence are all there. Furthermore, the acting enriches this drama with campy charisma, physicality, growth, and varied intensity. Consequently, Mad Max often feels like an outline of something surprisingly brilliant.


Technically, Mad Max is a grindhouse spectacle. The active yet informative imagery uses framing, movement, and depth. Its editing is riveting during action sequences, but its uneven structure drags in the second act. Stings, engines, perspective, and silence help the sound excel despite poor leveling. Its music offers energy, cheesy emotions, clunky tones, and clumsy volume. Although low-budget, its production design established the industrial-leather, post-apocalyptic aesthetic. The cast has realism, skill, and breakout star power. Its effects are the defining quality, with pyrotechnics, violence, and radical stunts. Overall, Mad Max is a quintessential diamond in the rough.


Writing: 6/10

Direction: 8/10

Cinematography: 9/10

Acting: 7/10

Editing: 6/10

Sound: 8/10

Score/Soundtrack: 6/10

Production Design: 9/10

Casting: 9/10

Effects: 10/10


Overall Score: 7.8/10


2 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Companion

Flight Risk

Comentarios


Post: Blog2_Post

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Movie Film Reviews. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page