top of page
Search

Pearl

Writer's picture: Gus KellerGus Keller


Pearl is eccentric. Its prequel plot is fairly thin and predictable, but its characters are substantive. The extreme protagonist feels repressed and trapped, and her mother is bitter from an unforgiving life. This careful groundwork makes their conflict complex and relatable. Consequently, Pearl is equally drama and horror. The building tension is paid off with violent thrills, but there are also cathartic monologues, motifs, and thematic dialogue that provide tragic weight. Furthermore, Goth's acting gradually evolves with facial expressions, outbursts, patience, motivated layers, and creepy dancing. Altogether, this gives Pearl significant emotional momentum.


Technically, Pearl is a stylish homage. Its editing employs smash cuts, freeze frames, intercuts, wipes, irises, split screens, and montages. Plus, the pacing is steady despite a sluggish ending. Similarly, the cinematography uses lighting, motion, focus, framing, angles, and composition. Still, it's the saturated colors that visually impress. There are detailed production designs, vivid effects, and fitting music. Also, Pearl's sound utilizes stings, exaggeration, split cuts, echoes, ambiance, and distortions for symbolism and mood. Overall, the distinct direction spins retro craft into psychological surrealism and classic flavor. Thus, this film is deeply engaging.


Writing: 7/10

Direction: 9/10

Cinematography: 8/10

Acting: 9/10

Editing: 8/10

Sound: 9/10

Score/Soundtrack: 9/10

Production Design: 8/10

Casting: 6/10

Effects: 8/10

Overall Score: 8.1/10

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Movie Film Reviews. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page