top of page
Search
Writer's pictureGus Keller

Salem's Lot



Salem's Lot is condensed to bare, derivative formulas. It has no time for themes, drama, or even a realized narrative. It's shocking how a movie can last two hours yet feel like so little happened. The setup and payoff are wildly misaligned (introduced concepts go nowhere and arcs aren't properly established). There's forced dialogue, superfluous characters, contrived motivations, flat villains, and absent resolution. The protagonists are woefully underdeveloped, leaving nothing to emotionally connect with. Consequently, it comes across as a series of vacant plot points. Meanwhile, the acting is either bland or wooden. Ultimately, Salem's Lot is a rough outline of a story.


Technically, Salem's Lot's atmospheric intentions are undermined by erratic tones. The imagery has stylized lighting, but is inconsistently aesthetic and mostly meaningless. Structurally unstable, its editing skips fundamental scenes, which fumbles pacing. The sound offers expected horror tricks like violence and stings. Though its scoring is generic, there's a recurring needle drop that makes a slight impression. Despite often looking artificial or cliche, the production design conveys an era, a small town, and an (overly) spooky ambiance. Its cast is completely replaceable. The effects combine decent makeup with subpar CGI. Overall, Salem's Lot isn't particularly worthwhile.


Writing: 3/10

Direction: 4/10

Cinematography: 7/10

Acting: 3/10

Editing: 3/10

Sound: 6/10

Score/Soundtrack: 5/10

Production Design: 6/10

Casting: 3/10

Effects: 5/10


Overall Score: 4.5/10


1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comentarios


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page