top of page
Search
Writer's pictureGus Keller

Silent Night (2023)



Silent Night has polarized strengths and weaknesses. Its absent dialogue is an ambitious gimmick that suits the genre. The protagonist has clear, understandable, and fierce motivations. However, the script is otherwise underwhelming. The narrative is extremely thin, generic, and predictable. There are repetitive beats, flat and superfluous characters, cliche tropes, plot armor, and overly simplified messages. Its ending is anticlimactic with minimal falling action. The acting is physical, intense, and one-note. Ultimately, Silent Night isn't sincere or considerate about its own themes, emotions, or implications. Aside from its silent premise, the story is wholly derivative.


Silent Night is surreal, kinetic, and uneven. The sound has stings, fades, emphasis, symbolism, distortions, silence, combat, contrast, and smash cuts. Its imagery uses framing, POVs, focus, lighting, oners, filters, angles, composition, motion, and murky colors. The editing adds slo-mo, inserts, action, freeze frames, passing cuts, match cuts, dissolves, montages, split screens, and saggy pacing. Its effects have solid stunts but excessive CGI. The music offers a lullaby motif, juxtaposing Christmas, restraint, and forgettable scoring. Its cast is replaceable and its production design feels incidental. Overall, Silent Night's style doesn't overcome its lack of substance.


Writing: 4/10

Direction: 7/10

Cinematography: 8/10

Acting: 7/10

Editing: 8/10

Sound: 9/10

Score/Soundtrack: 6/10

Production Design: 5/10

Casting: 5/10

Effects: 7/10


Overall Score: 6.6/10

8 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

コメント


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page