top of page
Search

The Matrix Revolutions

  • Writer: Gus Keller
    Gus Keller
  • Dec 22, 2021
  • 1 min read


On its own, The Matrix Revolutions is fine sci-fi. However, when it's inevitably compared to the original, The Matrix, it is disappointing. The more interesting comparison is to Reloaded, where Revolutions actually stands a chance. Unfortunately, even there, Revolutions is still a technical step down. The editing is less dynamic, the cast is watered down, and the overall direction is not as focused. Reloaded may have been misguided, but at least it had clear intentions. Generally, Revolutions feels somewhat generic. The action is more forgettable and the plot is average. The magic of the original is mostly lost here.


Yet, Revolutions isn't all bad. For one, it is far more concise than its predecessor. Revolutions isn't as intellectually ambitious as Reloaded, but it's also less obnoxious. The film falls into common sci-fi tropes but does so with relative efficiency. Plus, many Wachowski staples are still present: the cinematography is striking, the music is dramatic, the sound is flashy, and the production design is extravagant. The Wachowskis may have fumbled the script, but this project was constructed with noticeable craft. Thus, despite the dichotomy of honoring/failing its origins, Revolutions actually lands in-between as an adequate film.


Writing: 4/10

Direction: 6/10

Cinematography: 8/10

Acting: 7/10

Editing: 6/10

Sound: 8/10

Score/Soundtrack: 8/10

Production Design: 8/10

Casting: 7/10

Effects: 6/10


Overall Score: 6.8/10

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comentarios


Post: Blog2_Post

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Movie Film Reviews. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page