top of page
Search
Writer's pictureGus Keller

Beast



Beast has potential. It has a focused story, established characters, and a soft theme about nature's wrath. The pacing is efficient, there are cooldown drama moments, and plot devices are set up. Still, Beast falters because it becomes occasionally redundant, unbelievable, and shallow. Exposition is mostly delivered naturally, yet is sometimes contrived. Similarly, the dialogue can get distractingly explanatory. Furthermore, protagonists' decisions are often forced. Finally, the climax and resolution get fairly cheesy, undermining whatever substance Beast had. A more contemplative conclusion would've solidified a sincere message. As is, it's a spotty thriller with some adequate acting.


Technically, Beast has good intentions. It's captured in extended tracking shots, with abundant camerawork yet inconsistent composition. That roughness is forgivable given the ambition and furthers the immersion. Plus, there's golden lighting, Saharan colors, and scenic landscapes. Thus, the imagery is this film's engine (though the editing is key with split, smash, hidden, and match cuts). Meanwhile, there are distinct lion calls, fitting regional music, authentic production designs, decent effects (especially the wounds), and slightly surreal direction. Overall, Beast has crucial weaknesses and respectable strengths. It's acceptable entertainment, but also a missed opportunity.


Writing: 4/10

Direction: 6/10

Cinematography: 8/10

Acting: 6/10

Editing: 7/10

Sound: 7/10

Score/Soundtrack: 6/10

Production Design: 6/10

Casting: 6/10

Effects: 6/10

Overall Score: 6.2/10

2 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page